And now for something completely different…..
San Francisco has a lot of problems. I spent a week there in January and saw a lot of them first hand. Although I greatly enjoyed the Golden Gate Bridge State Park. Tolls are a problem. I got tired of paying just to cross a bridge. Of course I’ve also driven from Boston to Maine so I know tolls. But still… Why is it so stupid expensive just to cross a stupid bridge?
And then there is this problem:
*worse than pink nightmare
Sorry about that. Mind Bleach is on aisle 8. Get the name brand stuff, it works faster than the generic and only costs a few cents more per dose. No, look further down the aisle… On the right…. About knee high… So you’re tall.. Knee high on an average height person… 5′-9″ is average… There you go.. I don’t know how big of a bottle… You can’t ever have too much… Just get a big one… Besides, you will want to apply liberally.
Long way to go, but I got there… Anyway…
Apparently San Francisco has a sexual problem as well. And not this guy…
*not on boat
San Francisco also has a truth problem. That is to say, they can’t tell the truth. That’s pretty obvious as shown by their chosen Congress Person. When you combine the two, you end up with lying about sex. Apparently that’s a pretty big problem in San Francisco.
So big, that in August of 2009, the Imperial Government included $1,260,717.00 in funding to the University of California, San Francisco to develop new and better ways of collecting sexual information during surveys.
That’s right… Reliability of sexual data in surveys….
Let me quote from the grant abstract:
Research findings of sex surveys provide abundant empirical evidence that the reliability and validity of self-reported sexual behavior is a major problem, particularly when assessing behavior among those with multiple partners and sexually risky behaviors.
You can read the whole thing here…. Grant 1R01HD056950-01A2
In Other News of the Ironic, this grant was part of the Stimulus package. I didn’t know Obama was literal when he was selling a package to stimulate.
Some interesting statistics, aside from the $1,260,717.00 price tag.
50%: As reported on Recovery.org (see oxymoron) the project is only half complete. It’s been almost three years. I guess they just can’t finish properly…
.78: The number of jobs reported to have been created or saved. So $1.2 million to compensate one person for 30 hours a week. I would love that gig.
So there you have it. $1.2 million to try and find ways of getting San Franciscans to tell the truth when participating in a sex survey. Why in the world am I paying for this? Why is this so important that it trumps the 10th Amendment? Besides, how about a 6 pack of Zima or wine coolers? Wouldn’t that be easier to get people to talk about sex? And a lot cheaper.
*Mike, thanks for the photo, hope you and your seven friends didn’t have a hangover
In a nutshell, the problem is that when people fill out a survey by themselves, they lie. The know-it-all college academics opine:
We propose to conduct an experiment to test an innovative method of administering a survey interview–conversational interviewing–that has shown remarkable improvements in respondents’ understanding of survey questions and in the accuracy of their responses when compared to administering it using the standardized interviewing method.
So they think that people will be ore honest when talking to a live person than on an anonymous survey form.. Hmm…
Regardless, I can still think of better ways to spend $1,2,260,717.00… Can’t you?