Here at CentsToChange we believe that the Global Warming Super Cooling Climate Catastrophe is a bunch of garbage. The “scientists” who have been pushing this sociopolitical agenda for the last 40 years have proven to be frauds. That’s why Patrick Moore, a co-founder of Greenpeace with a PhD in Ecology, resigned from said environmental organization saying this:
“around the mid-80s, after 15 years in the leadership of Greenpeace, [he] found [himself, being] one of five international directors, the only one with any formal science education. Basically, Greenpeace was hijacked by political and social activists… who began adopting extremist positions on a number of issues. I saw the writing on the wall.”
Time after time, reports of falsifying data, peer reviewing their own work, and the same group of researchers referencing each others work in an endless circle has become the norm for the Global Warming Super Cooling Climate Catastrophe crowd. I finished reading The Delinquent Teenager Who Was Mistaken for he World’s Top Climate Expert, by Donna Laframboise not too long ago and it frightened me to see the innerworking of how the IPCC generates their climate reports and how quickly the reports are considered the gold standard for environmental studies. When you realize that grad students with no experience outside of academia are writing major sections of the report, you have to wonder why some kid is writing about weather patterns 200 years from now when they haven’t even experienced 30 years of weather themselves…
*buy this book
To say that we at CentsToChange don’t believe in the environmental left using baby seals and stranded polar bears as a way to guilt society into a Utopian civilization by their design does not mean we are against alternatives to fossil burning power generation. On the contrary…. As stated before on this blog, power coupled with clean water is the fuel to modernize any society. The biggest problem with fossil burning fuel is infrastructure. So the goal is to find a way to generate power (because with power you can have water well pumps) locally with minimal or zero infrastructure needs.
I personally believe the answer is hydrogen. It’s the most plentiful element in the universe and what fuels the sun. Yea. The sun. Interestingly enough, the byproduct of hydrogen fuel cells is pure water. Power and water. So we develop hydrogen fuel cells in a box that uses solar power as the catalyst, drop them into a village in Africa and you have instant sustainable, clean power and clean water. Honda is really close to solving this problem…
*I want one, although my aircraft carrier will still be nuclear powered
So I’m thinking.. Hmmm… The US military have bases in remote regions of the world. Like Alaska. And maybe they would be better off by providing locally generated power through renewable resources that don’t require any infrastructure. What a brilliant idea…
Apparently I’m not alone. In 2008, the Air Force erected a wind turbine in Tin City, AK.
*not as remote as Gilligan, but pretty close. I wonder if the Harlem Globetrotters accidentally stumbled on Tin City…
The wind turbine was constructed without the benefit of a prolonged wind study. Not even a single 4th grader and a kite. Zip. A study of wind patterns would have found that the area is extremely turbulent when it comes to wind conditions. As a result, an Inspector General report of the facility found that it produced “sporadic, unusable power.”
More from the Inspector General about Tin City:
“As of July 29, 2011, the wind turbine was still not operational and continued to incur costs. DoD cannot quantify actual cost savings generated from the wind turbine until the contractor completes all modifications to power production and 611th CES personnel measure overall operational performance.”
Over $3 million was spent on this turbine. But this isn’t the Imperial Government waste I’m talking about today. Just the back story….
Enter 2009. The year the IG spending floodgates opened wide and every politician stood at the door competing to see who could get the most. Not surprisingly, California won by a wide margin. Wyoming got the least. Check it out at Recovery.gov.
*California is the big line on the left
So we have a wind turbine in Tin City, AK that provides sporadic and unusable power at best, continues to cost unreasonable amounts of money to maintain, constructed on a site without a single feasibility study, built on a premise that “it gets windy sometimes, maybe we should have a wind turbine.” Awesome.
Those are perfect reasons to build three more. Yep…. Stimulus award number FA3002-08-D-0005 commissioned the construction of three more wind turbines using Tin City as the case study in other remote locations in Alaska.
Side note… If you look at the Recovery.gov listing for this project you’ll see that under “Funding Agency” it says: “Department of Defense (except military departments)” Huh? I though the DoD was one big military department… Anyway..
So $14,087,078.00 was confiscated from the hard working taxpayers of this great country to build wind turbines in a regions when they don’t work or generate consistent, usable electricity. Awesome.
In Other News of the Ironic, Alaska is one of the few remote locations where fossil fuel is readily available, nearby, and not that expensive. You could buy 3.4 million gallons of gas in Alaska for the same $14 million. And that’s at gas station prices, not direct from a refinery. Of which three are located in Alaska.
*proof that we care about baby seals
As expected, construction costs quickly exceeded those budgeted on two of the proposed sites by $1 million. On the third site, the project was cancelled altogether. Each facility is currently estimated to coast $5.7 million. So if they canceled one of the three and two cost $5.7 million each, then there should be $2,687,078.00 of the Stimulus money not being used and therefore returned. One would think…. Yet the Pentagon has said that the unused money won’t go back to the Treasury but, “spent on additional, appropriate project(s) yet to be identified.” Sure… I believe you….. Just like the GSA spent money on appropriate projects…
Doesn’t this just make you sick? We spend over $14 million on a project destined to fail because it was based on a pilot project that failed only to have unused funds absorbed into a project to be named later….
Adding insult to injury, Recovery.gov reported that this Stimulus money generated 1.3 jobs. Wow…
What would you do with $14,087,078.00?